# Intermediate: Purpose-built transformation steps

Once we’ve got our atoms ready to work with, we’ll set about bringing them together into more intricate, connected molecular shapes. The intermediate layer is where these molecules live, creating varied forms with specific purposes on the way towards the more complex proteins and cells we’ll use to breathe life into our data products.

### Intermediate: Files and folders​

Let’s take a look at the intermediate layer of our project to understand the purpose of this stage more concretely.

models/intermediate└── finance    ├── _int_finance__models.yml    └── int_payments_pivoted_to_orders.sql
• Folders
• ✅ Subdirectories based on business groupings. Much like the staging layer, we’ll house this layer of models inside their own intermediate subfolder. Unlike the staging layer, here we shift towards being business-conformed, splitting our models up into subdirectories not by their source system, but their area of business concern.
• File names
• ✅ int_[entity]s_[verb]s.sql - the variety of transformations that can happen inside of the intermediate layer make it harder to dictate strictly how to name them. The best guiding principle is to think about verbs (e.g. pivoted, aggregated_to_user, joined, fanned_out_by_quantity, funnel_created, etc.) in the intermediate layer. In our example project, we use an intermediate model to pivot payments out to the order grain, so we name our model int_payments_pivoted_to_orders. It’s easy for anybody to quickly understand what’s happening in that model, even if they don’t know SQL. That clarity is worth the long file name. It’s important to note that we’ve dropped the double underscores at this layer. In moving towards business conformed concepts, we no longer need to separate a system and an entity and simply reference the unified entity if possible. In cases where you need intermediate models to operate at the source system level (e.g. int_shopify__orders_summed, int_core__orders_summed which you would later union), you’d preserve the double underscores. Some people like to separate the entity and verbs with double underscores as well. That’s a matter of preference, but in our experience there are often intrinsic connection between entities and verbs in this layer that make that difficult to maintain.
##### Don’t over-optimize too early!

The example project is very simple for illustrative purposes. This level of division in our post-staging layers is probably unnecessary when dealing with this few models. Remember, our goal is a single source of truth. We don’t want finance and marketing operating on separate orders models, we want to use our dbt project as a means to bring those definitions together! As such, don’t split and optimize too early. If you have less than 10 marts models and aren’t having problems developing and using them, feel free to forego subdirectories completely (except in the staging layer, where you should always implement them as you add new source systems to your project) until the project has grown to really need them. Using dbt is always about bringing simplicity to complexity.

### Intermediate: Models​

Below is the lone intermediate model from our small example project. This represents an excellent use case per our principles above, serving a clear single purpose: grouping and pivoting a staging model to different grain. It utilizes a bit of Jinja to make the model DRY-er (striving to be DRY applies to the code we write inside a single model in addition to transformations across the codebase), but don’t be intimidated if you’re not quite comfortable with Jinja yet. Looking at the name of the CTE, pivot_and_aggregate_payments_to_order_grain we get a very clear idea of what’s happening inside this block. By descriptively labeling the transformations happening inside our CTEs within model, just as we do with our files and folders, even a stakeholder who doesn’t know SQL would be able to grasp the purpose of this section, if not the code. As you begin to write more complex transformations moving out of the staging layer, keep this idea in mind. In the same way our models connect into a DAG and tell the story of our transformations on a macro scale, CTEs can do this on a smaller scale inside our model files.

-- int_payments_pivoted_to_orders.sql{%- set payment_methods = ['bank_transfer','credit_card','coupon','gift_card'] -%} with payments as (   select * from {{ ref('stg_stripe__payments') }}), pivot_and_aggregate_payments_to_order_grain as (      select      order_id,           {% for payment_method in payment_methods -%}          sum(            case               when payment_method = '{{ payment_method }}' and                    status = 'success'                then amount                else 0             end         ) as {{ payment_method }}_amount,      {%- endfor %}      sum(case when status = 'success' then amount end) as total_amount   from payments   group by 1) select * from pivot_and_aggregate_payments_to_order_grain
• ❌ Exposed to end users. Intermediate models should generally not be exposed in the main production schema. They are not intended for output to final targets like dashboards or applications, so it’s best to keep them separated from models that are so you can more easily control data governance and discoverability.
• ✅ Materialized ephemerally. Considering the above, one popular option is to default to intermediate models being materialized ephemerally. This is generally the best place to start for simplicity. It will keep unnecessary models out of your warehouse with minimum configuration. Keep in mind though that the simplicity of ephemerals does translate a bit more difficulty in troubleshooting, as they’re interpolated into the models that ref them, rather than existing on their own in a way that you can view the output of.
• ✅ Materialized as views in a custom schema with special permissions. A more robust option is to materialize your intermediate models as views in a specific custom schema, outside of your main production schema. This gives you added insight into development and easier troubleshooting as the number and complexity of your models grows, while remaining easy to implement and taking up negligible space.

There are three interfaces to the organizational knowledge graph we’re encoding into dbt: the DAG, the files and folder structure of our codebase, and the output into the warehouse. As such, it’s really important that we consider that output intentionally! Think of the schemas, tables, and views we’re creating in the warehouse as part of the UX, in addition to the dashboards, ML, apps, and other use cases you may be targeting for the data. Ensuring that our output is named and grouped well, and that models not intended for broad use are either not materialized or built into special areas with specific permissions is crucial to achieve this.

• Intermediate models’ purposes, as these serve to break up complexity from our marts models, can take as many forms as data transformation might require. Some of the most common use cases of intermediate models include:

• ✅ Structural simplification. Bringing together a reasonable number (typically 4 to 6) of entities or concepts (staging models, or perhaps other intermediate models) that will be joined with another similarly purposed intermediate model to generate a mart — rather than have 10 joins in our mart, we can join two intermediate models that each house a piece of the complexity, giving us increased readability, flexibility, testing surface area, and insight into our components.

• ✅ Re-graining. Intermediate models are often used to fan out or collapse models to the right composite grain — if we’re building a mart for order_items that requires us to fan out our orders based on the quantity column, creating a new single row for each item, this would be ideal to do in a specific intermediate model to maintain clarity in our mart and more easily view that our grain is correct before we mix it with other components

• ✅ Isolating complex operations. It’s helpful to move any particularly complex or difficult to understand pieces of logic into their own intermediate models. This not only makes them easier to refine and troubleshoot, but simplifies later models that can reference this concept in a more clearly readable way. For example, in the quantity fan out example above, we benefit by isolating this complex piece of logic so we can quickly debug and thoroughly test that transformation, and downstream models can reference order_items in a way that’s intuitively easy to grasp.

• ❌ Used repeatedly in multiple models. If we’re referencing the same intermediate model in several places, it probably should be a macro, or we should reconsider how and where we’re bringing our models together. Remember our DRY principle: while it’s good that we’ve modularized our logic, bringing the same intermediate model into several downstream models usually indicates that we’re creating duplication in our output too early and recomputing the same transformations. Ideally, it’s in the marts layer that we’ll start bringing concepts together repeatedly to form a variety of outputs that often have similar data. Be wary of doing this in the intermediate layer, as it can lead to your DAG becoming confusing — generally an indicator that the mental models of our project flow are getting muddied. Additionally, it’s usually more efficient to join marts as they have been materialized into the warehouse, meaning we don’t have to recompute the entire chain of transformations in addition to the computing the joins.

Multiple outputs from an intermediate model, bringing the same model into several different marts, is typically a red flag in our DAG that we’re computing the same transformations multiple times.

• ✅ Used in one model. Bringing our intermediate models, staging models, and other marts together thoughtfully so our models can build on each other efficiently.

Multiple inputs to a model is generally preferable. Several inputs and one output at each node indicates we’re bringing our concepts together into richer, wider entities; forming a healthy DAG shaped like an arrowhead pointing to the right.

##### Narrow the DAG, widen the tables.

Until we get to the marts layer and start building our various outputs, we ideally want our DAG to look like an arrowhead pointed right. As we move from source-conformed to business-conformed, we’re also moving from numerous, narrow, isolated concepts to fewer, wider, joined concepts. We’re bringing our components together into wider, richer concepts, and that creates this shape in our DAG. This way when we get to the marts layer we have a robust set of components that can quickly and easily be put into any configuration to answer a variety of questions and serve specific needs. One rule of thumb to ensure you’re following this pattern on an individual model level is allowing multiple inputs to a model, but not multiple outputs. Several arrows going into our post-staging models is great and expected, several arrows coming out is a red flag. There are absolutely situations where you need to break this rule, but it’s something to be aware of, careful about, and avoid when possible.